The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is the independent regulatory body responsible for regulating solicitors, law firms, and certain legal professionals in England and Wales.
Its mandate is to protect the public, uphold the rule of law, and maintain confidence in the legal profession.
In the context of AML/CFT, the SRA functions as a supervisory authority for legal-sector compliance with the UK’s anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing regime, overseeing how regulated legal practices identify, assess, mitigate, and report financial crime risks.
The SRA sets regulatory standards, supervises compliance, enforces disciplinary action where breaches occur, and issues guidance to ensure that legal services are not misused for money laundering, terrorist financing, or other forms of financial crime.
Legal services occupy a critical position in the financial crime risk landscape.
Solicitors are routinely involved in high-value transactions, including property conveyancing, trust and company formation, probate, and complex cross-border structuring.
These services can be exploited to obscure beneficial ownership, legitimise illicit funds, or facilitate layering and integration.
The SRA regulates this risk by establishing binding rules and outcomes-focused standards that require solicitors and firms to operate effective AML/CFT controls.
While the SRA does not investigate predicate crimes, it supervises how legal professionals comply with the UK’s AML framework, including risk assessments, customer due diligence (CDD), enhanced due diligence (EDD), record keeping, and suspicious activity reporting.
The SRA’s supervisory role is aligned with national AML objectives, ensuring that the legal profession does not become a weak link in the UK’s financial crime prevention architecture.
The SRA acts as a professional body supervisor under the UK’s AML regime, specifically for the legal sector.
Its responsibilities are derived from the UK’s transposition of international standards into domestic law, particularly those implementing the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Recommendations.
Within AML/CFT frameworks, the SRA’s role includes:
The SRA’s approach is risk-based, focusing supervisory attention on higher-risk activities such as conveyancing, trust and company service provision, and cross-border work.
The SRA establishes mandatory standards through its regulatory framework, including:
These standards require firms to embed AML controls into governance, client acceptance, and transaction execution processes.
The SRA applies a risk-based supervisory model, which includes:
This approach aligns supervisory intensity with residual AML risk rather than applying uniform oversight.
To support compliance, the SRA publishes guidance and best-practice materials addressing:
Guidance is designed to be practical and proportionate, recognising differences across legal practice models.
Where firms or individuals fail to meet AML obligations, the SRA may:
Enforcement serves both corrective and deterrent purposes within the profession.
Solicitors and law firms regulated by the SRA must implement a comprehensive AML framework, typically including:
Responsibility for AML compliance typically rests with a nominated officer or money laundering reporting officer (MLRO), supported by senior management oversight.
Legal services present distinctive AML/CFT risk indicators, many of which the SRA emphasises in its supervisory work.
Common red flags include:
These indicators are particularly relevant in conveyancing, private client work, and corporate services.
Criminals may attempt to exploit legal services supervised by the SRA through methods such as:
The SRA’s guidance and enforcement history underscore the need for vigilance in these areas.
A firm acts on a residential property purchase funded through multiple offshore entities.
Weak source-of-funds verification allows illicit proceeds to be integrated into the UK property market.
A solicitor assists in forming a UK company owned by a slew of layered foreign trusts.
Inadequate beneficial ownership checks obscure criminal control of the entity.
Funds unrelated to any genuine legal transaction are routed through a firm’s client account to create an appearance of legitimacy before onward transfer.
These scenarios illustrate why the SRA places strong emphasis on client account controls and transaction purpose validation.
Non-compliance with SRA AML obligations can result in:
Effective AML compliance therefore protects both the public interest and the long-term viability of legal practices.
The SRA faces structural challenges common to professional body supervisors, including:
These challenges reinforce the importance of intelligence-led supervision and continuous guidance updates.
The SRA operates within a broader UK AML ecosystem that includes:
Governance expectations emphasise senior management accountability, documented controls, and demonstrable effectiveness.
The SRA plays a pivotal role in safeguarding the UK financial system by ensuring that legal services do not become conduits for financial crime.
Effective SRA supervision:
As financial crime risks grow in sophistication, the SRA’s supervisory effectiveness remains a critical component of the UK’s AML/CFT defences.
Move at crypto speed without losing sight of your regulatory obligations.
With IDYC360, you can scale securely, onboard instantly, and monitor risk in real time—without the friction.