SM&CR: Senior Managers & Certification Regime

Definition

The Senior Managers & Certification Regime (SM&CR) is a regulatory framework introduced in the United Kingdom to strengthen individual accountability, governance, and conduct within financial services firms.

It places explicit responsibility on senior individuals for specific business functions, requires firms to certify the fitness and propriety of key staff, and applies enforceable conduct rules across the organisation.

Within AML/CFT frameworks, SM&CR plays a critical role by ensuring that responsibility for financial crime controls, compliance failures, and systemic weaknesses is clearly assigned, documented, and enforceable.

SM&CR applies to banks, building societies, insurers, asset managers, investment firms, and certain payment and electronic money institutions regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA).

Its core objective is to reduce misconduct, improve risk culture, and prevent the diffusion of responsibility that historically contributed to major regulatory failures, including AML breaches.

Explanation

SM&CR replaced the former Approved Persons Regime following widespread regulatory concern that senior individuals were able to evade accountability during major financial scandals.

Under the previous model, enforcement actions often failed because responsibility for decision-making and control failures was unclear or poorly documented.

The regime restructures accountability through three integrated pillars:

• The Senior Managers Regime (SMR) assigns prescribed responsibilities to named individuals.
• The Certification Regime requires firms to assess and certify the fitness and propriety of certain employees annually.
• Conduct Rules, which establish minimum standards of behaviour applicable across the firm.

From an AML/CFT perspective, SM&CR embeds financial crime accountability directly into governance structures.

Senior managers cannot delegate accountability away; they remain responsible for ensuring that AML systems, controls, staffing, and escalation mechanisms are effective, resourced, and proportionate to risk.

SM&CR in AML/CFT Frameworks

SM&CR intersects with AML/CFT obligations by linking regulatory compliance failures directly to individual accountability.

Financial crime is no longer treated solely as an institutional failure but also as a leadership and governance issue.

Key AML/CFT linkages include:

• Explicit assignment of responsibility for AML, CTF, sanctions, and fraud controls to designated Senior Managers.
• Requirement for documented Statements of Responsibilities that clearly describe AML-related oversight roles.
• Heightened expectations for senior oversight of suspicious activity reporting, risk assessments, and remediation programmes.
• Enforcement mechanisms that allow regulators to pursue individuals for failure to take reasonable steps to prevent AML breaches.

Under SM&CR, inadequate AML frameworks, persistent control weaknesses, or repeated regulatory findings may expose senior managers to personal sanctions, including fines, prohibition orders, or public censure.

Key Components of SM&CR

Senior Managers Regime (SMR)

The SMR applies to individuals performing Senior Management Functions (SMFs).

These individuals hold ultimate responsibility for specific areas of the firm’s activities.

Core elements include:

• Prescribed Responsibilities, which must be allocated among Senior Managers, including responsibility for financial crime systems and controls.
• Statements of Responsibilities, which document each Senior Manager’s exact remit and decision-making authority.
• Management Responsibilities Maps, which show how responsibilities are distributed across the firm.

For AML/CFT, this structure ensures that accountability for compliance, transaction monitoring, suspicious activity reporting, and regulatory engagement is clearly traceable to named individuals.

Certification Regime

The Certification Regime applies to employees whose roles could pose a significant risk of harm to the firm or its customers, but who are not Senior Managers.

Certified roles may include:

• Heads of compliance or financial crime teams below the senior management level.
• Staff involved in transaction monitoring, sanctions screening, or investigations.
• Individuals with significant influence over onboarding, payments, or high-risk customer relationships.

Firms must assess and certify these individuals as fit and proper at least annually, considering honesty, integrity, competence, capability, and financial soundness.

Conduct Rules

Conduct Rules apply to almost all employees within SM&CR firms and establish baseline behavioural standards.

Key rules relevant to AML/CFT include:

• Acting with integrity.
• Exercising due skill, care, and diligence.
• Being open and cooperative with regulators.
• Taking reasonable steps to control the business effectively and manage risks.

Breaches of AML obligations often trigger Conduct Rule breaches, particularly where failures involve negligence, poor oversight, or lack of escalation.

AML/CFT Risks & Accountability Under SM&CR

SM&CR significantly increases the regulatory consequences of AML failures by personalising accountability.

Key risk areas include:

• Weak transaction monitoring frameworks that generate excessive false positives or miss material suspicious activity.
• Inadequate resourcing of financial crime teams relative to transaction volume or risk profile.
• Poor-quality risk assessments that fail to reflect evolving typologies or regulatory expectations.
• Failure to remediate known AML deficiencies promptly.
• Inadequate oversight of outsourcing, fintech partnerships, or correspondent banking relationships.

Where such failures occur, regulators assess whether Senior Managers took “reasonable steps” to prevent or mitigate the risk.

Documentation, governance evidence, and escalation records become critical.

Examples of SM&CR in AML/CFT Contexts

Senior Manager Accountability for AML Failures

A bank experiences repeated regulatory findings related to weak transaction monitoring and delayed suspicious activity reporting.

Under SM&CR, the Senior Manager responsible for financial crime controls may be investigated to determine whether reasonable steps were taken to address known weaknesses, allocate sufficient resources, and escalate issues to the board.

Certification Failure in Financial Crime Teams

A firm certifies an investigations manager without adequate assessment of competence.

Significant AML alerts are mishandled, leading to regulatory breaches.

The firm may face enforcement action for improper certification, while senior management may be questioned on oversight failures.

Conduct Rule Breaches Linked to AML Lapses

An executive ignores internal warnings about sanctions screening gaps to prioritise business growth.

This behaviour may constitute a Conduct Rule breach in addition to underlying AML violations, increasing enforcement exposure.

Impact on Financial Institutions

SM&CR materially alters how institutions design and operate AML frameworks.

Key impacts include:

• Stronger governance and documentation around AML decision-making.
• Increased emphasis on evidencing oversight, challenge, and escalation.
• Higher personal accountability is driving more conservative risk appetites.
• Greater investment in compliance infrastructure, training, and controls.
• Cultural shift toward proactive risk ownership rather than reactive remediation.

Institutions that fail to align AML programmes with SM&CR expectations often face compounded regulatory risk, including firm-level penalties and individual enforcement.

Challenges in Implementing SM&CR for AML/CFT

Despite its benefits, SM&CR presents operational and governance challenges:

• Defining responsibility boundaries in complex, matrix-managed organisations.
• Ensuring responsibility maps accurately reflect real decision-making authority.
• Avoiding “tick-box” certification processes that lack substantive assessment.
• Maintaining up-to-date documentation during organisational change.
• Balancing commercial pressure with regulatory accountability.

In AML contexts, these challenges are amplified by evolving typologies, high transaction volumes, and increasing regulatory scrutiny.

Regulatory Oversight & Enforcement

Regulators use SM&CR as both a supervisory and enforcement tool.

Key expectations include:

• Clear allocation of AML responsibilities to specific Senior Managers.
• Evidence that senior leaders actively oversee and challenge AML frameworks.
• Timely remediation of identified deficiencies.
• Transparent engagement with regulators and financial intelligence units.
• Accurate and timely reporting of Conduct Rule breaches related to AML issues.

Failure to meet these expectations can result in enforcement action against both the firm and individuals.

Importance of SM&CR in AML/CFT Compliance

SM&CR strengthens AML/CFT compliance by embedding accountability at the highest levels of governance.

It ensures that financial crime risk is treated as a strategic issue rather than a purely operational concern.

Effective implementation enables institutions to:

• Reduce systemic AML weaknesses through clear ownership.
• Improve the quality and credibility of compliance programmes.
• Demonstrate regulatory seriousness and governance maturity.
• Align culture, incentives, and accountability with financial crime prevention.
• Enhance trust with regulators, counterparties, and the wider financial system.

As regulatory expectations continue to rise, SM&CR remains a cornerstone framework for ensuring that AML/CFT controls are not only designed but actively owned, enforced, and continuously improved.

Related Terms

• Individual Accountability
• Statements of Responsibilities
• Financial Crime Controls
• Conduct Rules
• Fit and Proper Assessment
• Reasonable Steps Doctrine

References

• Financial Conduct Authority – Senior Managers and Certification Regime (Overview)
• Financial Conduct Authority – SM&CR: A Guide for Firms
• Financial Conduct Authority – Financial Crime Guide (AML systems and controls expectations)
• UK Government – Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013 (legislative basis for accountability reforms)
• Prudential Regulation Authority – Strengthening individual accountability in banking

Ready to Stay
Compliant—Without Slowing Down?

Move at crypto speed without losing sight of your regulatory obligations.

With IDYC360, you can scale securely, onboard instantly, and monitor risk in real time—without the friction.

Get a Demo