star-1
star-2

Money Laundering Stage: Placement

Definition

Placement is the first stage of money laundering in which illicit proceeds are introduced into the formal financial system or the legitimate economy.

It involves converting, depositing, transferring, or otherwise injecting illegally obtained funds into channels where they appear to originate from lawful activity.

Because placement involves handling physical cash or immediately traceable proceeds, it is the stage at which criminals face the highest risk of detection.

Effective AML/CFT controls at this phase aim to prevent illicit funds from entering regulated financial institutions, payment systems, or value-transfer networks.

Explanation

Placement serves as the foundational entry point for transforming illicit cash into assets or account balances that can later be layered and integrated.

Criminal proceeds often originate in cash-heavy predicate crimes such as drug trafficking, corruption, smuggling, extortion, or illegal wildlife trade.

In many cases, large volumes of cash present logistical challenges: storage, transportation risk, and visibility to law enforcement.

To mitigate these challenges, criminals attempt to inject funds into channels that allow the money to appear legitimate.

This may involve cash deposits below reporting thresholds, converting cash into monetary instruments or digital assets, and using cash-intensive businesses to disguise illicit inflows.

Once placement succeeds, the funds can move deeper into the financial system and be further obscured through layering.

Placement typologies vary significantly depending on geography, available reporting frameworks, regulatory strength, and the sophistication level of the criminal network.

Financial institutions rely on customer profiling, cash monitoring systems, structuring detection, surveillance of high-risk products, and enhanced due-diligence measures to mitigate this risk.

Placement in AML/CFT Frameworks

Placement risk is embedded in multiple AML/CFT obligations, including customer due diligence, suspicious transaction reporting, and monitoring of high-risk delivery channels.

Institutions must maintain visibility into how customers fund accounts, use cash, and transact across products.

Key AML/CFT intersections include:

  • Customer onboarding and KYC procedures that identify cash-intensive customers, geographic risks, and beneficial ownership.
  • Transaction monitoring systems designed to detect structured deposits, unusual cash activity, or account behaviour inconsistent with declared profiles.
  • Evaluating the legitimacy of cash-based businesses, merchant activities, and retail operations.
  • Applying enhanced due diligence where customers rely on cash sources or operate in sectors historically connected to predicate crimes.
  • Ensuring cash-handling staff and branches detect suspicious patterns in deposits, withdrawals, and cashier-instrument purchases.
  • Compliance with currency transaction reporting (where applicable) and thresholds defined by domestic laws and FATF standards.

Placement is also a focus of supervisory authorities because weaknesses at this stage enable the entire laundering chain to proceed undetected.

Key Components of the Placement Stage

Common Placement Methods

Criminals deploy various mechanisms to insert funds into the financial system.

These include:

  • Depositing cash into bank accounts directly or through associates.
  • Using cash-intensive businesses such as restaurants, convenience stores, gaming centres, or transportation services.
  • Structuring deposits just below reporting thresholds to avoid detection.
  • Purchasing monetary instruments like money orders, prepaid cards, or cashier’s cheques using illicit cash.
  • Using informal value transfer systems to convert cash into transferable credits.
  • Converting cash into virtual assets, often through unregulated exchanges.
  • Smuggling cash across borders to deposit in jurisdictions with weaker AML controls.

High-Risk Sectors for Placement

Certain business types inherently involve large volumes of cash, creating opportunities for:

  • Hospitality and food-service operations
  • Retail stores with high daily revenue
  • Casinos and gaming operators
  • Import–export businesses
  • Fuel stations and transportation services
  • Scrap-metal, recycling, or salvage yards
  • Informal or semi-formal financial services providers

These sectors require proportionate due-diligence measures to differentiate legitimate cash flows from illicit ones.

Risks & Red Flags Associated With Placement

Placement carries immediate detection risks for criminals, but financial institutions also face substantial exposure if controls fail.

Key risks include:

  • Introduction of illicit funds into the institution’s ecosystem, enabling further laundering.
  • Structuring activity designed to evade reporting thresholds.
  • Disguising criminal proceeds as business revenue.
  • Use of third parties or proxies to distance criminals from cash deposits.
  • Cross-border transportation of cash into the institution’s jurisdiction.
  • Use of financial products that provide anonymity or rapid liquidity.

Indicative red flags include:

  • Frequent cash deposits inconsistent with customer profile or stated business size.
  • Sudden spikes in cash activity following periods of inactivity.
  • Multiple small deposits made across branches or ATMs within a short timeframe.
  • Customers unwilling or unable to explain the source of cash.
  • Cash deposits made by individuals not associated with the account.
  • Structuring patterns that consistently avoid reporting thresholds.
  • Use of cash to purchase high-value items immediately resold for traceable payments.

Common Methods & Techniques Used in Placement

Criminal networks regularly refine placement strategies to avoid detection. Typical techniques include:

  • Structuring (Smurfing): Breaking large sums into smaller transactions to circumvent reporting obligations.
  • Cash-intensive business commingling: Mixing illicit cash with legitimate business revenue.
  • Front companies: Using legitimate-looking enterprises that claim high cash turnover to disguise deposits.
  • Casinos and gaming chips: Converting cash into chips, engaging in limited gambling, and cashing out as “winnings.”
  • Currency smuggling: Transporting cash to foreign jurisdictions with weaker AML oversight.
  • Trade-based mechanisms: Using false invoicing to inject illicit money into accounts aligned with cross-border transactions.
  • Use of intermediaries: Employing employees, family members, or low-risk individuals to deposit funds.

Examples of Placement Scenarios

Deposit Structuring Through Multiple Branches

A criminal network distributes cash to several couriers who deposit amounts just below the reporting threshold at multiple branches.

The bank sees varied deposits across locations, making the aggregated illicit inflow harder to detect without advanced analytics.

Cash-Intensive Business Commingling

A retail business generates legitimate daily cash revenue.

Criminals supplement this with illicit proceeds and deposit the blended cash as claimed business income.

Unless the institution performs sectoral benchmarking or enhanced due diligence, the activity appears normal.

Casino Conversion

Cash obtained through narcotics operations is carried into a casino.

The criminal buys chips, makes minimal wagers, and cashes out. The casino issues a cheque or transfers funds electronically, giving the appearance of lawful earnings.

Virtual Asset Conversion

Illicit actors deposit cash into an unregulated or lightly monitored kiosk or platform to purchase virtual assets.

The assets are quickly transferred across wallets, initiating the layering phase.

Cross-Border Cash Movement

Individuals smuggle cash into a jurisdiction known for less stringent reporting.

The funds are then deposited into local banks under the guise of tourism or business proceeds.

Impact on Financial Institutions

Weaknesses in detecting placement attempts expose institutions to several adverse outcomes:

  • Regulatory penalties for failing to detect structured deposits or other placement activities.
  • Reputational harm arising from association with criminal networks.
  • Potential loss of correspondent banking relationships.
  • Increased investigative and operational costs, including SAR/STR filings, customer reviews, and account restrictions.
  • Greater exposure to other financial crimes such as fraud, corruption, and terrorist financing

Institutions must invest in robust branch surveillance, cash monitoring systems, behavioural analytics, and frontline training to mitigate these risks.

Challenges in Detecting & Preventing Placement

Placement detection is inherently challenging, particularly in high-volume or cash-heavy environments.

Key challenges include:

  • Difficulty distinguishing illicit cash from legitimate high-turnover business revenue.
  • Structuring designed to exploit threshold-based reporting systems.
  • Reliance on frontline staff judgment in face-to-face cash transactions.
  • Incomplete or inaccurate customer profiles, affecting the ability to compare behaviour to expected norms.
  • Cross-border flows that move cash into weaker regulatory environments before re-entering formal channels.
  • Cash-to-virtual-asset pathways that bypass traditional monitoring systems.
  • High false-positive rates in rules-based monitoring, requiring intelligence-driven refinement.

Regulatory Oversight & Governance

Regulators place significant emphasis on preventing illicit funds from entering the financial system.

Supervisory expectations commonly include:

  • Strong internal controls for cash handling, branch operations, and ATM deposit monitoring.
  • Sectoral risk assessments covering cash-intensive businesses.
  • Threshold-based reporting and mandatory cash-transaction filings.
  • Enhanced due diligence for customers with high cash turnover or opaque source-of-funds declarations.
  • Clear escalation procedures for frontline staff.
  • Audit trails demonstrating that the institution can detect and investigate placement-related anomalies.
  • Use of analytics, risk scoring, and typology-driven monitoring frameworks aligned with FATF guidance.

Governance structures must ensure oversight from the board’s risk committee, senior management, and compliance leadership, ensuring accountability for controls preventing illicit fund entry.

Importance of Addressing Placement Risks in AML/CFT Compliance

Addressing placement risk is central to safeguarding the integrity of financial systems. Effective controls help institutions:

  • Prevent illicit funds from entering regulated channels.
  • Maintain compliance with global standards such as the FATF Recommendations.
  • Reduce exposure to criminal networks and predicate offences.
  • Protect their brand, customers, and correspondent relationships.
  • Strengthen intelligence-led AML programmes through improved data quality and behavioural insight.
  • Enhance overall detection across layering and integration stages by limiting the early success of laundering attempts.

Preventing placement is the first and most decisive opportunity for financial institutions to disrupt criminal activity and uphold the integrity of AML/CFT frameworks.

Related Terms

  • Money Laundering
  • Layering
  • Integration
  • Structuring
  • Cash-Intensive Business
  • Source of Funds

References

Ready to Stay
Compliant—Without Slowing Down?

Move at crypto speed without losing sight of your regulatory obligations.

With IDYC360, you can scale securely, onboard instantly, and monitor risk in real time—without the friction.

Get a Demo
charts charts-dark