star-1
star-2

Neobank

Definition

A neobank is a fully digital financial institution that delivers banking services through mobile and web interfaces without operating traditional physical branches. Neobanks typically offer services such as deposits, payments, cards, personal or business accounts, and financial management tools.

Their operating model relies on cloud-native infrastructure, API-driven integrations, and user-centric digital interfaces.

In AML/CFT compliance contexts, neobanks represent both an opportunity for enhanced, data-driven financial crime controls and a risk vector due to rapid onboarding, high transaction velocity, cross-border exposure, and reliance on outsourced partners.

Explanation

The neobank model emerged from technological innovation and consumer demand for frictionless, accessible financial services.

Unlike traditional banks, neobanks operate with lean cost structures and technology-first infrastructures, enabling speed, scalability, and differentiated customer experiences.

However, their digital-only presence transforms the AML/CFT control environment.

Risk visibility depends on the quality of digital identity verification, behavioural monitoring, partner oversight, and real-time analytics.

Neobanks often rely on Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS) providers, card processors, cloud environments, and fintech partners, which creates layered and distributed responsibilities for AML/CFT obligations.

Neobanks may be licensed as full banks, operate under electronic money institution (EMI) licences, or partner with licensed banks for regulatory coverage.

Regardless of model, regulators increasingly expect neobanks to meet standards equal to or higher than those applied to traditional institutions due to their scale, onboarding velocity, and exposure to typologies such as synthetic identity fraud, money mules, and digital payment laundering.

Neobanks in AML/CFT Frameworks

Neobanks intersect with AML/CFT regulatory regimes across multiple touchpoints.

Their digital footprint shapes both their vulnerabilities and their ability to deliver enhanced oversight.

Key intersections include:

  • Customer onboarding and digital KYC must reliably establish true identity using document verification, biometrics, liveness checks, and device intelligence.
  • Transaction monitoring must account for high-throughput digital transactions, wallet-to-wallet transfers, and API-connected payment flows.
  • Risk scoring frameworks must evaluate behavioural patterns, digital identity signals, and typologies specific to online ecosystems.
  • Outsourcing arrangements (BaaS, card issuing, payment partners) require strong AML governance, SLAs, audits, and shared responsibility matrices.
  • Cross-border exposure is heightened due to instant digital payments, international remittances, and virtual card transactions.
  • Suspicious activity reporting remains a core obligation, requiring automated and human-led investigations for anomalies detected across large digital datasets.

Key Components of Neobank Risk

Victimisation and Predicate Crimes

Neobanks may be exploited in connection with predicate offences such as:

  • Fraud typologies include digital scams, account takeovers, and synthetic identity creation.
  • Cybercrime networks use instant payments to rapidly dissipate illicit proceeds.
  • Human trafficking, smuggling, or exploitation rings use mule networks.
  • Tax evasion or corruption-related flows conducted through layered digital accounts.
  • Digital asset-related offences where illicit proceeds are converted into or out of neobank accounts.

Three Risk Stages Relevant to Neobanks

While neobanks do not change the fundamental stages of money laundering, their digital nature influences how these stages manifest:

Placement

Illicit funds may enter the neobank ecosystem through rapid digital onboarding, instant account creation, and micro-deposits routed via online payment processors.

Layering

High-speed transfers between neobank accounts, wallets, prepaid instruments, and virtual cards may facilitate anonymity and rapid dispersal.

Integration

Funds may be legitimised through business accounts, e-commerce payments, gig-economy income routes, digital invoices, or cross-border settlements.

Common Neobank-Related Money Laundering Techniques

Criminals exploit digital ecosystems by leveraging:

  • Fabricated or synthetic identities created via compromised or manipulated digital documents.
  • Networks of mule accounts that transfer funds instantly with limited geographic restrictions.
  • High-volume micro-transactions intended to evade pattern-based monitoring.
  • Virtual or prepaid card programmes are used to obscure the source and destination of funds.
  • API-based payment flows or third-party fintech integrations where monitoring controls vary in maturity.
  • Rapid conversion between fiat and digital assets across partner exchanges.
  • Account opening using compromised devices, anonymised IP addresses, or VPNs.

Risk Indicators & Red Flags

Patterns commonly associated with neobank AML/CFT risks include:

  • High velocity of inbound and outbound transfers is inconsistent with the customer profile.
  • Multiple accounts opened using overlapping device fingerprints or behavioural markers.
  • Rapid movement of funds immediately after account opening.
  • Use of intermediary fintech platforms for circular or obscured fund flows.
  • Frequent small-value transactions that accumulate into meaningful transfers.
  • IP geolocation is inconsistent with stated residence or device indicators.
  • Sudden spikes in gig-economy or marketplace income without economic rationale.
  • Card-not-present or virtual card transactions are tied to high-risk merchant categories.

Examples of Neobank Financial Crime Scenarios

Synthetic Identity Mule Networks

Fraud actors create synthetic profiles using partial real identity data.

These identities open multiple accounts across neobanks and receive funds from scam victims.

The funds are rapidly split and transferred before detection.

Instant Payment Laundering

Illicit proceeds from phishing fraud are pushed into several neobank accounts.

Instant payments allow the funds to be fragmented and moved internationally within minutes.

Gig-Economy Abuse

Criminal entities route laundered proceeds through fake service providers or merchant accounts, masking them as earnings from ridesharing, delivery services, or freelancing platforms.

Neobank–Crypto Channel Mixing

Customers transfer funds between neobank accounts and crypto platforms frequently, using mixers or privacy tokens before returning funds to fiat accounts.

Merchant Fraud and Chargeback Laundering

Illicit merchants process shell transactions through neobank-linked payment gateways, later reversing or refunding them to unrelated accounts.

Impact on Financial Institutions

Neobanks face heightened consequences if AML/CFT frameworks are inadequate:

  • Regulatory sanctions, increased supervisory scrutiny, or licensing restrictions.
  • Reputational damage affects customer acquisition, investor confidence, and partnership networks.
  • Loss of BaaS or card-issuing partnerships due to perceived AML weaknesses.
  • Higher operational costs driven by investigations, alerts, remediation programmes, and technology investment.
  • Reduced access to correspondent banking or settlement networks.
  • Legal exposure due to potential complicity in cross-border criminal schemes.

Challenges in Detecting & Preventing AML in Neobanks

Key structural and operational challenges include:

  • Fast onboarding and real-time transactions leave narrow windows for pre-transaction risk filtering.
  • High customer volume and digital identity variability increase false positives and false negatives.
  • Fragmented vendor and partner environments complicate end-to-end AML oversight.
  • Sparse data in early customer lifecycle stages limits risk stratification accuracy.
  • Criminals exploit digital automation and behavioural mimicry to evade rule-based systems.
  • Cloud-native architectures require strong security governance, auditability, and role segregation to protect data integrity.

Regulatory Oversight & Governance

Regulators globally have sharpened expectations for neobank AML/CFT frameworks.

Key requirements include:

  • Risk-based customer due diligence aligned with digital identity assurance standards.
  • Strong controls for onboarding high-risk categories such as politically exposed persons (PEPs), cross-border merchants, or businesses with opaque ownership.
  • Robust transaction monitoring combining rules, typology detection, machine learning, and device intelligence.
  • Clear governance frameworks defining AML responsibilities between neobanks and their BaaS or payment partners.
  • Independent audits, model validation, and continuous testing of control effectiveness.
  • Timely filing of suspicious transaction reports and cooperation with financial intelligence units (FIUs).
  • Board oversight ensuring AML strategy, resources, and technology remain fit for purpose.

Importance of Addressing AML/CFT Risks in Neobanks

Managing AML/CFT risk is critical to the sustainability and integrity of the neobank model.

Effective controls allow institutions to:

  • Prevent facilitation of fraud, money laundering, and terrorism financing.
  • Maintain regulatory compliance across multiple jurisdictions.
  • Build trust among customers, partners, and investors.
  • Preserve access to card networks, payment infrastructures, and correspondent banks.
  • Enable scalable digital growth without sacrificing risk governance.
  • Strengthen intelligence-led monitoring through analytics, device behaviour, and typology detection.

Neobanks must continuously adapt their controls to evolving typologies, regulatory expectations, and technological advancements.

An intelligence-first, data-driven approach supported by strong governance is essential for resilience.

Related Terms

  • Digital KYC
  • Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS)
  • Fintech
  • E-Money Institution (EMI)
  • Virtual Card
  • Money Mule
  • Instant Payments
  • Transaction Monitoring

References

Ready to Stay
Compliant—Without Slowing Down?

Move at crypto speed without losing sight of your regulatory obligations.

With IDYC360, you can scale securely, onboard instantly, and monitor risk in real time—without the friction.

Get a Demo
charts charts-dark