star-1
star-2

License

Definition

A license, in the context of financial services and regulated sectors, is an official authorisation or permit granted by a competent regulatory or supervisory authority, enabling a person, firm, or organisation to conduct specific regulated activities.

It formally establishes that the licensee has met the regulatory requirements, including capital, governance, compliance, and AML/CFT obligations, that the authority deems necessary for the activity.

In the AML/CFT framework, a license plays a crucial role by signalling that a regulated entity is subject to ongoing oversight, required to maintain internal controls, monitor risks, and fulfil reporting obligations.

Without a proper license when required, a firm may operate outside the regulatory perimeter and pose heightened financial crime risk.

Explanation

Licensing serves as the foundational gateway into regulated markets.

It not only authorises permissible activities but also triggers the application of regulatory obligations, including AML/CFT, sanctions screening, risk assessment, internal audit, and governance.

From the regulator’s perspective, licensing is a mechanism to control entry, to define the scope of allowed business, to assess the fitness and propriety of operators, and to apply conditions or enforce sanctions.

Licenses vary widely depending on jurisdiction, sector (banking, payments, virtual assets, insurance, trust services), and business model.

Some licenses permit broad banking activity; others are narrowly scoped (for example, money transfer services or digital asset trading).

For the AML/CFT practitioner, the type of licence held dictates the applicable controls, the supervisory regime, and the risk profile of the licensee.

Operating under a licence provides several advantages.

Regulatory legitimacy, access to systems and clearing channels, correspondent banking relationships, and enhanced public trust.

However, it also imposes responsibilities, periodic reporting, inspections, audits, board oversight, capital adequacy, and AML/CFT programme maintenance.

License in AML/CFT Frameworks

Licensing intersects with AML/CFT in the following ways:

Gate-keeping and Entry Control

Regulators use licenses to ensure that applicants meet minimum standards for governance, capital, beneficial ownership transparency, and risk management.

By vetting applicant firms, authorities help prevent the entry of higher-risk entities into the financial system.

Triggering Regulatory Obligations

Holding a license often activates a defined set of compliance obligations:

  • Licence-holders must implement AML/CFT programmes proportionate to their risk.
  • Licence conditions typically include submission of periodic risk assessments, audit reports, and suspicious transaction reports.
  • Regulators may impose specific licence conditions relating to AML/CFT, such as independent review, training, KYC standards, or sanctions compliance.

Scope Definition and Activities Supervised

The licence defines permissible activities and thereby delineates the supervised business model.

If a firm undertakes activity beyond its licence scope, this can indicate a regulatory breach or increased illicit finance risk.

Ongoing Supervision and Enforcement

Licence-issuers maintain oversight of licensees via inspections, audits, data submission, and enforcement powers (suspension, revocation).

This ongoing supervision strengthens the control environment against money laundering and financing of terrorism.

Risk Rating and Correspondent Access

From the viewpoint of counterparties and correspondent banks, the presence of a valid licence is a key indicator of legitimacy and oversight.

It aids in risk-rating the entity and determining correspondent or partner “reliance”.

Key Components of a Licence Regime

Applicability and Scope

  • Licence classification depending on activity, e.g., deposit-taking, payments, virtual assets, trust services.
  • Definition of permitted services, geographical reach, cross-border operations, and agent networks.
  • Conditions for use of sub-licences, branches, or agents.

Fitness and Propriety Requirements

  • Assessment of directors, senior management, and beneficial owners.
  • Requirements on financial soundness, integrity, and absence of adverse regulatory or criminal history.
  • Transparency on ownership, capital structures, and control mechanisms.

Capital, Governance, and Internal Controls

  • Minimum capital or liquidity thresholds appropriate to the activity.
  • Governance requirements include independent board members, internal audit, and risk committees.
  • Compliance obligations: AML/CFT programme, sanctions policies, fraud controls.

Reporting, Audit, and Record-keeping

  • Obligation to provide periodic financial statements, audit reports, and AML/CFT risk assessments.
  • Maintenance of records on KYC, transactions, suspicious activity, and incident reports.
  • Obligation to retain records for defined retention periods.

Supervision, Inspection, and Enforcement

  • Rights of the regulator to inspect premises, systems, and audit trails.
  • Sanctions: licence suspension, revocation, administrative fines, criminal referrals.
  • Requirements to notify the regulator of changes in ownership, management, or risk profile.

Renewal, Variation, and Termination

  • Periodic licence renewal processes often require re-assessment of fitness and compliance.
  • Variation of licence scope in response to business model changes.
  • Termination: voluntary surrender or regulatory cancellation triggers winding-down obligations and possibly restrictions on residual liabilities.

Examples of Licence Scenarios

  • A fintech obtains a payments licence permitting cross-border money transfers. Under the licence, it must implement a risk-based AML/CFT programme, report suspicious transactions, and submit annual audit reports.
  • A virtual asset service provider acquires a digital asset licence under a national regulator, enabling custodial wallet services. The licence conditions require enhanced due diligence for virtual asset flows and peer-to-peer transfers.
  • A bank applies for a deposit-taking licence; the regulator assesses the bank’s board, capital plan, internal audit function, fraud controls, and AML/CFT programme before granting the licence.
  • An insurance intermediary becomes licensed as a trust and corporate service provider. The licence imposes requirements to verify beneficial ownership of client companies and file STRs when trust-based structures are used for financial crime.
  • A money services business operates under a small-value remittance licence but elects to add an agent network; the licence variation triggers additional obligations for agent oversight, KYC processes, and transaction monitoring.

Impact on Financial Institutions

Enhanced Market Access

Holding a valid licence often confers market access, bank accounts, clearing access, correspondent relationships, and regulatory legitimacy.

This expands business opportunities for the institution.

Regulatory Risk Mitigation

By meeting licensing requirements and continuing compliance, institutions reduce exposure to regulatory enforcement, fines, reputational damage, and derisking by counterparties.

Risk-Based Controls Activation

The licence condition compels the institution to implement risk-based AML/CFT controls, which in turn strengthen its ability to detect and respond to financial crime.

Operational Burden

Licensing carries costs. Initial application fees, ongoing reporting, regulatory audits, compliance staff, training, and certification.

Institutions must weigh benefits against overhead.

Reputational Signal

A valid licence signals credibility and oversight. Conversely, operating without a required licence can trigger red flags for correspondent banks, counterparties and regulators.

Correspondent Banking and Outsourcing Risk

Correspondent banks often rely on licence status to assess partner risk.

Inadequate licensing may result in derisking or exclusion from global payment networks and clearing systems.

Challenges in Licence Regimes

Regulatory Arbitrage

Cross-border operations may exploit jurisdictions with lax licensing regimes, creating risks of oversight gaps, consortium abuse, and illicit finance exposure.

Scope Creep and Shadow Activity

Licensees expanding activity beyond their authorised scope can introduce risk.

Shadow banking or unlicensed agent networks may operate outside regulatory view.

Evolving Business Models

New technologies, such as fintech, embedded finance, platform-banking, and virtual assets, challenge traditional licensing frameworks.

Regulators must adapt to innovations while licence-holders must stay compliant.

Licence Misuse and Fraud

Licence certificates or authorisations may be forged or misrepresented.

Fraudulent entities may claim licence status while lacking substance, exposing them to AML/CFT risk and regulatory enforcement.

Variation and Global Consistency

Differing licensing models between jurisdictions create challenges for firms operating internationally.

Harmonising licence definition, conditions, and oversight remains a key task for global supervisors.

Regulatory Oversight & Governance

Licensing Authorities

National regulators, central banks, financial services commissions, and supervisory bodies issue licences, define conditions, and maintain registers of authorised entities.

They assess applicant fitness, monitor ongoing compliance, and apply sanctions where necessary.

International Standards

Regulatory standards (for example, Financial Action Task Force’s recommendations) emphasise that licensing and supervision are integral to AML/CFT frameworks.

Licensing supports the principle that vulnerable sectors should be subject to regulated entry and oversight.

Supervisory Cooperation

Authorities often collaborate via information-sharing, mutual recognition, and cross-border supervision to manage license-holders operating internationally or across groups.

Licence Revocation and Remediation

Regulators typically have the power to impose conditions, suspend or revoke licences.

Effective remediation mechanisms exist, including winding-down provisions, transfer of licence, or forced exit to protect depositors, customers, and broader financial integrity.

Importance of Understanding Licence in AML/CFT Compliance

License status is a key indicator of an entity’s regulatory standing, oversight coverage, and susceptibility to financial crime risk. For AML/CFT professionals, verifying licence integrity and scope is foundational to customer onboarding, third-party risk assessment, and correspondent due diligence.

When institutions incorporate licence checks into their onboarding and ongoing monitoring processes, they achieve:

  • Preventing engagement with unauthorised entities operating outside the regulatory perimeter.
  • Ensuring counterparties are subject to regulatory oversight, which reduces exposure to money laundering, terrorist financing, fraud, and sanctions breaches.
  • Calibrating risk ratings and due diligence procedures based on licence type, scope, and conditions.
  • Enabling ongoing monitoring of licence variations, suspension, or revocation as part of the entity’s risk profile.
  • Strengthening documentation for audits, internal controls, and regulatory examinations.

For firms operating globally, licence regimes can vary significantly; understanding the exact licence scope, conditions, supervising authority, and any licence-related conditions is critical to maintaining compliance and avoiding inadvertent exposure.

References

Ready to Stay
Compliant—Without Slowing Down?

Move at crypto speed without losing sight of your regulatory obligations.

With IDYC360, you can scale securely, onboard instantly, and monitor risk in real time—without the friction.

charts charts-dark