Lending refers to the provision of credit by financial institutions, non-bank lenders, fintech platforms and other lending entities to individuals, businesses or other organisations. In the context of anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-financing of terrorism (CFT), lending activities present specific risks because the credit lifecycle—from application, approval, disbursement, repayment and monitoring—can be used by illicit actors to launder proceeds, disguise illicit funds, or facilitate the movement of value in ways that evade detection. The “lending and AML” nexus covers all stages of the process including customer onboarding, credit underwriting, disbursement, servicing and exit.
Explanation
Lending inherently involves risk because the lender accepts that the borrower will repay over time and may rely on collateral, guarantees or other security. When AML/CFT considerations are overlaid, the credit function can be compromised if the borrower or underlying transaction is connected to illicit financial flows, corruption, fraud or sanctioned entities. Lending can thus become a vehicle for:
injecting illicit funds into the formal financial system disguised as legitimate borrowing or repayment;
layering of criminal proceeds via repeated borrowings, repayments and re-borrowings;
integration of illicit funds through loan repayments that appear typical;
movement of funds across jurisdictions using syndicated credit, trade-linked lending or cross-border financing.
In modern AML/CFT frameworks, lenders must identify and mitigate such risks through robust screening, due diligence, transaction monitoring, credit risk assessment, collateral verification, continuous review and the integration of AML controls into their credit risk management frameworks.
Lending in AML/CFT Frameworks
Lending sits at a critical intersection of credit risk and financial crime risk. Effective AML/CFT controls in lending require alignment across multiple functional areas within a lender’s operations.
Customer Onboarding
When a potential borrower approaches a lender, AML/CFT risks should be assessed alongside credit risk. Key considerations include:
Whether the borrower is a politically exposed person (PEP) or connected to high-risk jurisdictions.
Whether the borrower uses complex ownership structures, shell companies, or trusts as part of the loan request.
Whether the proposed loan purpose or collateral is consistent with the borrower’s business profile or source of wealth.
Whether there is a significant upfront disbursement or high transaction volume inconsistent with the borrower profile.
Credit Underwriting and Approval
During underwriting, the lender should evaluate not only credit viability but also the money laundering risk inherent in the borrower, purpose of funds and collateral. This involves:
Checking collateral provenance and valuation to ensure it is not purchased with illicit proceeds.
Assessing third-party involvement (guarantors, brokers, agents) for potential criminal networks.
Evaluating loan structure — e.g., very short-term high-volume borrowing or frequent roll-overs may indicate layering.
Reviewing cross-border flow involvement, particularly where funds move to or from high-risk jurisdictions.
Disbursement and Monitoring
After loan approval, the disbursement and repayment lifecycle present ongoing risk. Lenders should:
Monitor repayments for unusual patterns such as early pay-offs, secondary trading of loan obligations, or unexpected fund sources.
Detect rapid borrow-repay cycles, cross-borrowing among affiliated entities or mismatched fund flows.
Review collateral release or sale post-loan for signs of integration of illicit funds.
Ensure transactional flows align with the borrower’s declared business activities.
Exit and Recovery
When the loan reaches maturity or enters recovery, AML risks may still persist. Key areas include:
Sale of collateral to a related party at inflated prices as a means of value transfer.
Assignment or factoring of loans to special-purpose vehicles or offshore structures.
Use of recovery proceeds to fund unrelated high-risk activities or jurisdictions.
Key Risk Factors in Lending for AML/CFT
Various factors elevate the AML/CFT risk in lending operations. Lenders must be aware of these to calibrate controls appropriately.
High-value loans used for purchase of real estate, luxury assets or high-end equipment.
Rapid growth of portfolio or borrower behaviour inconsistent with business profile.
Cross-border lending or correspondent relationships with banks in weak-regulation jurisdictions.
Use of complex ownership structures, shell companies or special-purpose vehicles.
Lending to entities with minimal operational history, limited transparency or high-cash turnover.
Pre-disbursement repayments, loan roll-overs, early repayments or frequent refinancing.
Collateral valuations derived via related parties or located in high-risk jurisdictions.
Agent or broker networks used to source borrowers, especially if commission driven and opaque.
Unusual borrower transactions following disbursement, such as rapid transfers to unrelated accounts.
Examples of Lending-Based AML/CFT Scenarios
To illustrate how lending may be abused for money laundering, consider these scenarios:
Shell-Company Loan
A newly-formed entity with little trading history applies for a large loan secured by nominal collateral. After disbursement, the entity repays the loan using funds from unrelated third parties. The original loan proceeds have been laundered through a seemingly legitimate borrowing mechanism.
Real-Estate Credit Flow
A borrower takes out credit for property purchase in a high-value location. The source of the down payment is unclear. Later, the borrower refinances the loan and sells collateral at a substantial discount to an affiliated entity, effectively transferring value across borders.
Agent-Driven Micro-Lending
A micro-finance lender uses a broad agent network to reach underserved customers. One agent targets communities with minimal documentation, enabling quick loans and repayments by groups acting as conduits for illicit funds.
Trade-Linked Lending
A corporate borrower obtains a working-capital loan under a trade finance arrangement. The underlying invoices are inflated or fictitious, allowing illicit proceeds to be disguised in the loan and crammed into repayments over several months.
Impact on Lending Institutions
AML/CFT failures in the lending context can have significant consequences.
Regulatory Risk and Sanctions
Regulators expect lenders to integrate AML/CFT into credit risk frameworks. Failures may lead to enforcement actions, fines or withdrawal of licence.
Financial Loss
Lenders may face losses not only from default but from recovery efforts compromised by fraudulent or illicit structures.
Reputational Damage
Involvement in laundering via lending operations can severely damage an institution’s brand, investor confidence and customer trust.
Operational Strain
Investigations into credit and financial crime overlap scenarios require broader disclosure, multiple teams, external consultants and extended timelines.
Challenges in Mitigating Lending-Based AML/CFT Risk
Lending institutions face specific challenges when implementing AML/CFT controls.
Data limitations: Borrowers may provide incomplete or misleading information.
Complexity of business models: Syndicated lending, fintech marketplaces and peer-to-peer platforms complicate monitoring.
Rapid innovation: New digital credit products, embedded lending and API-driven disbursements create fresh risk areas.
Agent-and-broker networks: High dependency on third parties may reduce control and oversight.
Closure of flowing funds: Disguised repayments and rapid movement of funds across jurisdictions can be difficult to trace.
Evolving typologies: Criminals may exploit lending for layering and integration in novel ways.
Balancing customer experience and compliance: Expanding credit access while maintaining rigorous AML controls requires trade-offs.
Governance and Regulatory Expectations
Lending operations must align with global and national AML/CFT standards, integrated into credit risk management and subject to oversight.
Credit risk frameworks must incorporate money-laundering risk as a dimension alongside borrower creditworthiness.
Board and senior management must own and oversee AML/CFT risk in the lending line of business.
Policies and procedures should cover lending-specific AML/CFT risks including onboarding, underwriting, disbursement, monitoring and exit.
Training and competence programmes must ensure credit officers, underwriting staff and loan servicing teams understand financial crime risks.
Internal audit and compliance should review lending portfolios, sample credit files and test for laundering-related indicators.
Regulatory reporting (e.g., suspicious transaction reports) must capture lending transactions exhibiting suspect characteristics, not just deposit and wire transfers.
Importance of Lending-Focused AML/CFT Compliance
A robust AML/CFT framework for lending helps institutions:
Protect their business model from exploitation by criminals.
Design tailored monitoring and screening processes for credit portfolios.
Enhance early detection of illicit behaviour that intersects with credit operations.
Build stronger resilience against regulatory scrutiny and reputational risk.
Align credit risk management and financial-crime risk management in an integrated fashion.
Support effective allocation of resources to higher-risk credit products and borrowers.
Because lending is a significant channel in financial intermediation, integrating AML/CFT into lending practices is vital for financial system integrity and long-term institutional sustainability.
Related Terms
Credit Risk Customer Due Diligence (CDD) Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) Transaction Monitoring Agent Network Risk Correspondent Lending Trade Finance Lending
References
Bank for International Settlements – Sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d353.pdf