Hawala

Definition

Hawala is an informal value transfer system (IVTS) that enables the movement of funds without the physical or electronic transfer of money through formal banking channels.

It operates on trust-based networks of brokers, commonly known as hawaladars, who settle transactions using balance accounts, family ties, business relationships, or reciprocal obligations.

In AML/CFT contexts, hawala presents elevated risks due to anonymity, limited documentation, absence of customer verification, and its ability to move large sums across borders without detection.

While hawala can serve legitimate purposes, such as low-cost remittances for migrant populations, it can also facilitate money laundering, terrorist financing, tax evasion, and criminal proceeds transfers.

Explanation

Hawala systems predate modern banking and remain deeply embedded in regions such as South Asia, the Middle East, and parts of Africa.

Transactions occur outside regulated financial systems: A customer pays a hawaladar in one location, and another hawaladar pays the recipient abroad, often within minutes, without cross-border wire transfers.

This decentralised structure makes hawala efficient, inexpensive, and culturally resilient.

However, it also creates vulnerabilities:

• Limited oversight by financial regulators.
• Minimal or no record-keeping.
• Complex settlement mechanisms that obscure fund origins.
• Use of code words, trusted networks, and informal agreements.

In AML/CFT frameworks, hawala is classified as a high-risk channel because it can:

• Conceal the source of funds,
• Bypass sanctions,
• Facilitate cross-border movement of criminal proceeds,
• Support the financing of terrorism or radical networks,
• Allow layering and integration of illicit funds undetected.

Despite these risks, hawala also plays a critical socioeconomic role in regions where banking infrastructure is weak, expensive, or inaccessible.

Regulatory responses often aim to balance oversight with financial inclusion.

Hawala in AML/CFT Frameworks

Hawala interacts with multiple AML/CFT control areas. Financial institutions must remain vigilant when dealing with customer behaviour indicative of informal value transfers.

Customer Risk Assessment

Hawala exposure increases risk ratings for:

• Customers linked to high-risk geographic corridors.
• Businesses in cash-intensive sectors with cross-border dealings.
• Individuals with frequent informal remittance patterns.

Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD)

EDD may be triggered when customer activities show indicators of hawala-like behaviour, such as:

• Unexplained cash deposits followed by outward transfers.
• Rapid movement of funds across unrelated accounts.
• Use of personal accounts for large business transactions.

Transaction Monitoring

Indicators associated with hawala networks include:

• Structured deposits and withdrawals.
• Frequent transfers below reporting thresholds.
• Round-tripping or offsetting transactions.
• Transfers to or from high-risk jurisdictions lacking AML controls.

Sanctions Exposure

Hawala networks may intersect with sanctioned individuals, terrorism-linked intermediaries, or high-risk jurisdictions.

Screening gaps in informal transfers increase the danger of indirect sanctions breaches.

Suspicious Transaction Reporting

When financial institutions detect hawala-related red flags, they must:

• File Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs),
• Document unusual behaviour,
• Escalate investigations through fraud and AML teams.

How Hawala Works: Key Components

Hawaladar Network

Hawaladars act as intermediaries. Each maintains a ledger, formal or informal, tracking obligations.

Settlements are conducted through:

• Trade misinvoicing,
• Cash couriers,
• Goods transfers,
• Reciprocal payment flows.

Code-Based Communications

Transactions may use:

• Code words,
• Symbols,
• Family names,
• Trusted identifiers.

These reduce traceability and increase difficulty for law enforcement.

Settlement Mechanisms

Hawaladars settle balances through various methods, including:

• Goods shipments valued to offset debts,
• Over- or under-invoicing of trade goods,
• Real estate transfers,
• Cash swaps across borders,
• Use of business cash flows to reconcile ledger balances.

Documentation Practices

Most hawala transactions rely on:

• Minimal paperwork,
• Handwritten ledgers,
• Coded references,
• Verbal agreements.

The absence of structured documentation increases opacity and AML/CFT risk.

Examples of Hawala Scenarios

Legitimate Remittance Use

A migrant worker uses a hawaladar to send funds to family in a remote village with limited access to banks.

The hawaladar network facilitates rapid transfer for a small fee.

Criminal Proceeds Laundering

A drug trafficking network deposits cash into hawala channels.

Funds are transferred internationally, mixed with legitimate remittances, and reintegrated through businesses owned by hawaladars.

Terrorist Financing

An extremist organisation receives funds from supporters across different countries.

The hawala network moves these funds to operatives without triggering banking system alerts.

Trade-Based Settlements

A business owner uses trade misinvoicing to adjust hawala balances, masking cross-border fund movements as legitimate commercial transactions.

Cash Smuggling and Hawala Hybrid

Criminal groups combine hawala with cash couriers.

Cash is collected locally while equivalent value is released abroad, bypassing border controls.

Impact on Financial Institutions

Regulatory Scrutiny

Institutions associated, directly or indirectly, with hawala-related activities face:

• Enforcement actions,
• Reremediation requirements,
• Penalties for AML/CFT failures.

Reputational Damage

Links to hawala laundering networks can undermine customer trust and damage relationships with correspondent banks.

Operational Burden

Investigating hawala-related alerts requires deep knowledge of cultural, geographic, and typology-specific behaviours.

Cross-Border Risk Amplification

Banks dealing with customers who operate in hawala-prone regions face heightened transactional and compliance risks.

Suspicious Activity Reporting Load

Frequent hawala-like patterns can increase STR filings, investigative workloads, and ongoing monitoring needs.

Challenges in Managing Hawala Risk

Anonymity of Participants

Minimal identity verification allows individuals to conduct transactions without formal records, hindering AML controls.

Cultural Acceptance

In many regions, hawala is deeply rooted in community trust, making regulatory enforcement challenging.

Weak Oversight in Certain Jurisdictions

Some countries have limited regulatory capacity to monitor IVTS activity, enabling hawaladars to operate freely.

Integration With Legitimate Business

Hawaladars may own trading firms, currency exchange houses, or travel agencies, using them as fronts for financial settlement.

Mixing of Illicit and Legitimate Funds

Hawala often blends proceeds from crime with genuine remittances, complicating detection.

Use of Sophisticated Typologies

Modern hawala networks combine:

• Digital communication channels,
• Encrypted messaging,
• Crypto assets,
• Trade-based laundering.

Inconsistent Global Standards

Regulatory approaches to hawala differ significantly across countries, creating opportunities for regulatory arbitrage.

Regulatory Oversight and Governance

Financial Action Task Force (FATF)

FATF classifies hawala under informal value transfer systems and requires jurisdictions to:

• Register or license hawaladars,
• Monitor their activities,
• Enforce AML/CFT controls,
• Mandate suspicious reporting.

National Regulators and Central Banks

Many countries require hawaladars to:

• Obtain licences,
• Maintain basic records,
• Implement KYC procedures,
• Report suspicious activities.

Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs)

FIUs analyse reports related to IVTS, identifying:

• Hawala-related suspicious patterns,
• Terrorism financing flows,
• Trade misinvoicing indicators.

Law Enforcement Agencies

Cross-border cooperation is often required to investigate hawala networks involved in:

• Organised crime,
• Drug trafficking,
• Smuggling,
• Terrorism.

Customs and Border Agencies

Physical cash couriers linked to hawala may be intercepted at airports or borders, triggering investigations into broader networks.

Importance of Detecting Hawala Activity in AML/CFT Compliance

Detecting hawala-related activity is essential for financial institutions aiming to prevent illicit financial flows.

Effective hawala detection measures align with global AML/CFT expectations and strengthen institutional risk frameworks.

Strong controls help institutions:

• Identify suspicious customer behaviour,
• Detect cross-border flows inconsistent with profiles,
• Prevent money laundering and terrorism financing,
• Strengthen customer risk assessments,
• Protect against regulatory penalties,
• Maintain correspondent banking relationships.

Given hawala’s global footprint, evolving typologies, and integration with criminal ecosystems, institutions must apply intelligence-led monitoring, risk-based due diligence, and cross-team coordination to manage exposure.

Modern AML systems—including architectures such as IDYC360’s intelligence-first AML framework, reinforce hawala detection through behavioural analytics, cross-domain intelligence, and dynamic risk scoring.

Related Terms

• Informal Value Transfer Systems
• Trade-Based Money Laundering
• Terrorist Financing
• Structuring
• Cross-Border Remittances
• Risk Profiling
• Beneficial Ownership

References

• FATF – Money Laundering Through Informal Value Transfer Systems
• UNODC – Money Laundering and Hawala
• IMF – Informal Funds Transfer Systems
• Europol – Criminal Networks and Financial Abuse

Ready to Stay
Compliant—Without Slowing Down?

Move at crypto speed without losing sight of your regulatory obligations.

With IDYC360, you can scale securely, onboard instantly, and monitor risk in real time—without the friction.

Get a Demo