star-1
star-2

Due Diligence

Overview

Due diligence is a fundamental compliance process in Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (CFT) frameworks.

It refers to the investigation and verification measures undertaken by financial institutions and regulated entities to identify, assess, and understand the risks associated with customers, business relationships, or transactions.

At its core, due diligence ensures that organizations “know their customers” before establishing a relationship or carrying out a transaction, protecting them from inadvertently facilitating financial crimes such as money laundering, terrorism financing, sanctions evasion, or corruption.

The concept has evolved from being a standard business precaution to a legal and regulatory requirement under global AML/CFT regimes.

Due diligence not only helps firms detect suspicious activity but also demonstrates regulatory compliance and operational integrity to supervisory bodies.

Types of Due Diligence in AML/CFT

AML frameworks recognize multiple levels of due diligence, each proportionate to the assessed risk level. These are typically categorized as follows:

Customer Due Diligence (CDD)

Customer Due Diligence is the foundational layer of AML compliance.

It involves verifying the customer’s identity using reliable, independent documents, data, or information.

The goal is to ensure that the entity or individual is who they claim to be and that their source of funds is legitimate.

CDD measures typically include:

  • Collecting basic identification details such as name, address, and date of birth.
  • Verifying identity through official documents (passports, national IDs, corporate registration certificates, etc.).
  • Understanding the nature and purpose of the business relationship.
  • Conducting ongoing monitoring of the customer’s transactions for consistency with their risk profile.

Financial institutions must perform CDD before onboarding clients, during the course of the relationship, and when red flags indicate possible risk escalation.

Simplified Due Diligence (SDD)

Simplified Due Diligence applies when the risk of money laundering or terrorist financing is low.

Regulators allow SDD for certain low-risk products, services, or customers, such as government bodies or publicly listed companies.

However, SDD doesn’t mean skipping verification; it simply reduces the depth or frequency of checks.

For instance, while identification is still required, enhanced scrutiny or source-of-funds verification may be unnecessary in low-risk cases.

Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD)

Enhanced Due Diligence is required when higher risk factors are present.

This applies to customers with complex ownership structures, politically exposed persons (PEPs), cross-border transactions, or business relationships in high-risk jurisdictions.

EDD involves more comprehensive verification measures, such as:

  • Obtaining detailed information on the customer’s source of wealth and funds.
  • Performing deeper background checks, including adverse media screening.
  • Increasing transaction monitoring frequency.
  • Requiring senior management approval to onboard or maintain the relationship.

EDD reflects the “risk-based approach” mandated by global AML standards, ensuring that institutions allocate greater scrutiny where the potential for abuse is highest.

The Risk-Based Approach (RBA)

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) advocates a Risk-Based Approach to due diligence.

This principle enables financial institutions to calibrate the extent of due diligence according to the level of risk posed by a customer or activity.

Key elements of an effective RBA include:

  • Risk Assessment: Identifying the inherent risk associated with customer type, geography, industry, and delivery channel.
  • Risk Scoring: Assigning measurable risk ratings based on assessment outcomes.
  • Mitigation Controls: Implementing due diligence measures proportionate to risk, CDD for normal risk, SDD for low risk, and EDD for high risk.

An RBA ensures that compliance resources are utilized efficiently and that institutions remain adaptable to evolving threats and typologies.

Due Diligence in Corporate & Third-Party Relationships

Beyond customer verification, due diligence extends to corporate relationships, third-party vendors, and mergers or acquisitions.

In these contexts, it helps identify exposure to legal, financial, reputational, and regulatory risks.

For example:

  • Third-Party Due Diligence: Involves assessing suppliers, agents, or intermediaries for potential links to corruption or sanctions violations.
  • Merger and Acquisition (M&A) Due Diligence: Evaluates target companies for hidden liabilities, regulatory violations, or exposure to financial crime.
  • Beneficial Ownership Verification: Identifies the natural persons who ultimately own or control a legal entity, addressing opacity that facilitates money laundering.

Effective due diligence across these dimensions helps institutions maintain a comprehensive risk management posture and demonstrate compliance readiness during audits or regulatory reviews.

Regulatory Expectations & Global Standards

Regulators across jurisdictions have codified due diligence obligations through laws and guidelines aligned with FATF Recommendations.

  • FATF Recommendations 10–12: Mandate CDD, ongoing monitoring, and EDD for higher-risk categories.
  • European Union AML Directives (AMLD 4–6): Establish specific requirements for beneficial ownership transparency and PEP due diligence.
  • USA PATRIOT Act (Section 326): Enforces identity verification procedures for customers of U.S. financial institutions.
  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS): Provides principles for managing risks related to cross-border correspondent banking and customer onboarding.

These frameworks collectively ensure that financial institutions adopt globally consistent due diligence procedures that are both risk-sensitive and adaptable.

Ongoing Due Diligence

Due diligence is not a one-time exercise.

Ongoing due diligence (ODD) involves continuous monitoring of customer activities and updating risk assessments as circumstances change. This process includes:

  • Reviewing transaction patterns for anomalies or deviations.
  • Updating customer information when changes in ownership, address, or business operations occur.
  • Reassessing risk levels periodically or when suspicious indicators emerge.

Automated monitoring systems now play a vital role in enabling continuous due diligence at scale, integrating adverse media checks, sanctions screening, and behavioral analytics.

Challenges in Implementing Due Diligence

Despite regulatory clarity, institutions face several challenges:

  • Data Fragmentation: Incomplete or inconsistent customer data across systems can hinder effective verification.
  • Complex Ownership Structures: Shell companies and layered corporate hierarchies obscure beneficial ownership.
  • Evolving Threats: Rapidly changing typologies, such as crypto-based laundering, complicate traditional due diligence models.
  • Resource Constraints: Maintaining compliance amid increasing regulatory expectations can be costly and time-consuming.

To overcome these challenges, institutions are increasingly investing in AI-driven screening tools, integrated KYC utilities, and risk intelligence platforms that streamline the due diligence process.

Due Diligence & Technology

Modern compliance operations rely heavily on technology to enhance accuracy and efficiency.

Machine learning algorithms can identify patterns indicative of risk; natural language processing assists in adverse media screening; and blockchain-based digital identities simplify cross-border verification.

Additionally, on-premises solutions offer data sovereignty advantages, ensuring sensitive customer information remains within a controlled environment, a growing priority for financial institutions in regulated sectors.

Documentation & Record-Keeping

An essential component of due diligence is maintaining comprehensive records.

Regulatory authorities require institutions to retain identification and transaction records for a minimum duration (typically five to ten years).

Documentation should include:

  • Copies of identification documents.
  • Risk assessment results.
  • Transaction and monitoring logs.
  • Records of internal approvals or escalations.

Proper documentation not only ensures audit readiness but also supports investigations into potential suspicious activity.

Importance in AML/CFT Compliance

Due diligence acts as the foundation of all AML/CFT measures.

Without it, other controls, such as transaction monitoring or suspicious activity reporting, become ineffective.

It helps financial institutions:

  • Prevent the onboarding of high-risk or sanctioned entities.
  • Detect early warning signs of illicit transactions.
  • Maintain regulatory compliance and avoid penalties.
  • Build trust and credibility with customers, regulators, and stakeholders.

In essence, due diligence transforms compliance from a box-ticking obligation into a proactive shield against financial crime.

Related Terms

  • Customer Due Diligence (CDD)
  • Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD)
  • Simplified Due Diligence (SDD)
  • Know Your Customer (KYC)
  • Beneficial Ownership
  • Risk-Based Approach (RBA)
  • Politically Exposed Person (PEP)
  • Sanctions Screening

References

Ready to Stay
Compliant—Without Slowing Down?

Move at crypto speed without losing sight of your regulatory obligations.

With IDYC360, you can scale securely, onboard instantly, and monitor risk in real time—without the friction.

Get a Demo
charts charts-dark