star-1
star-2

Dual-Use Goods

Definition & Overview

Dual-use goods are items, technologies, or materials that can be used for both civilian and military purposes.

These goods are generally subject to regulation to prevent their misuse in activities related to the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), terrorism, or other illegal military actions.

The regulation of dual-use goods is an essential part of international trade control systems, particularly in relation to the enforcement of sanctions and compliance with non-proliferation agreements.

In an AML/CFT context, the export, transfer, and sale of dual-use goods are scrutinized to prevent their misuse for criminal purposes such as the financing of terrorism or military activities that may contribute to conflicts or the creation of weapons.

Governments, regulators, and financial institutions must ensure that dual-use goods are not being diverted to illicit activities, a process that involves extensive monitoring and compliance checks.

Detailed Explanation & Key Components

Examples of dual-use goods

Dual-use goods encompass a wide variety of items, from high-tech computer equipment and communications devices to chemicals, raw materials, and machinery. Some common examples include:

  • Electronics and computing equipment: High-performance microprocessors, software, and encryption devices. 
  • Chemicals and raw materials: Substances that can be used for both civilian purposes (e.g., industrial chemicals) and military purposes (e.g., explosives or chemical weapons precursors). 
  • Aircraft and missile technology: Technologies related to aerospace, which have both civilian and military applications, such as drones, rockets, or advanced materials used in aircraft manufacturing. 
  • Nuclear-related goods: Items used in civilian nuclear power generation, but that can also be used for the production of nuclear weapons, such as uranium enrichment technology.

Regulatory frameworks and compliance

The regulation of dual-use goods involves several layers of international and national compliance requirements, most notably governed by frameworks such as the Wassenaar Arrangement, the EU Dual-Use Regulation, and the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 in the United States.

These frameworks are designed to control the export of dual-use goods and technologies to countries or entities that may use them for malicious purposes.

In an AML/CFT context, these frameworks are directly linked to the prevention of proliferation financing (PF), which is the financial support of illicit military activities, often tied to the development or transfer of dual-use goods.

Financial institutions must screen transactions involving goods that fall under these controls to ensure that they do not finance terrorism or military actions.

Screening and due diligence

Financial institutions, exporters, and manufacturers must conduct comprehensive Know Your Customer (KYC) and Know Your Transaction (KYT) processes to identify and mitigate the risks associated with dual-use goods. This includes:

  • Customer background checks: Verifying that customers, especially those involved in the export or sale of dual-use goods, are not linked to entities involved in terrorism, WMD proliferation, or other illegal activities. 
  • Sanctions screening: Ensuring that customers or transactions do not involve individuals, organizations, or countries subject to international sanctions related to the proliferation of dual-use goods. 
  • Transaction monitoring: Identifying suspicious transactions involving dual-use goods, such as unusual patterns of export or indirect transfers that could indicate diversion to illegal uses.

Regulatory & Compliance Relevance

Sanctions enforcement

Dual-use goods are often subject to specific export controls and sanctions.

For instance, the U.S. Department of Commerce maintains the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), which lists items considered to be dual-use and requires specific licenses for their export.

Violations of these controls can lead to severe penalties, including fines and loss of access to global financial systems.

AML/CFT regulations require institutions to ensure compliance with these export control laws, especially when dealing with high-risk jurisdictions.

Transactions involving dual-use goods must be screened against lists of sanctioned individuals, entities, and countries to ensure compliance with UN Security Council Resolutions, EU regulations, and national security laws.

Prevention of financing terrorism

Dual-use goods can be used to finance terrorism, particularly through the acquisition of technologies or raw materials that can be repurposed for military or militant activities.

AML and CFT frameworks are designed to prevent the misuse of financial systems to support terrorism, including the illicit trade of dual-use goods.

Financial institutions are required to report suspicious transactions and collaborate with national and international authorities to prevent the flow of funds to entities that could use these goods for harmful purposes.

Risk-based approach

A key component of dual-use goods control in the context of AML/CFT is applying a risk-based approach to the identification, monitoring, and reporting of transactions involving these goods.

This includes assessing factors such as:

  • The destination country for the goods (e.g., whether it is subject to export restrictions or is a known proliferation risk). 
  • The nature of the transaction (e.g., whether it involves high-risk entities or intermediaries). 
  • The intended use of the goods, as disclosed by the customer or trade partner.

By applying a risk-based approach, financial institutions can prioritize their resources to investigate and monitor transactions with higher potential for misuse, while ensuring compliance with export control laws.

Real-World Examples / Applications

Example 1: Suspicious transaction in the aerospace sector

A company based in a country under international sanctions attempts to purchase high-tech aircraft components that are classified as dual-use.

The transaction is flagged by the bank’s transaction monitoring system, as it appears to involve a company previously linked to military production.

The bank’s compliance team escalates the matter, conducting further due diligence and reporting the transaction to the relevant authorities.

Example 2: Export of chemical precursors

A chemical manufacturer receives an order for large quantities of industrial chemicals that could also be used to produce explosives.

Upon reviewing the transaction, the manufacturer notices that the order is being shipped to a country with a history of involvement in terrorist activity.

After conducting KYC checks, the company reports the transaction to the relevant export control authority and halts the shipment pending further investigation.

Example 3: Diversion of nuclear technology

A company selling uranium processing technology receives an order from a country suspected of seeking to develop nuclear weapons.

The company’s due diligence process uncovers discrepancies in the purchaser’s business background, suggesting that the order may not be for civilian purposes.

The transaction is halted, and the company works with authorities to investigate potential proliferation financing.

Challenges & Considerations

Complexity of dual-use goods identification

Determining whether a good or technology qualifies as dual-use can be challenging, particularly when the intended purpose is not clear.

Different jurisdictions may apply different criteria for categorizing dual-use goods, creating challenges for international trade and enforcement.

Financial institutions and exporters must stay updated on the latest regulatory lists and controls to accurately identify potential dual-use goods.

Jurisdictional differences in enforcement

Different countries may have different definitions of what constitutes dual-use, and enforcement levels can vary significantly.

This can create challenges for institutions with global operations or those involved in cross-border transactions.

Ensuring that internal controls are harmonized across jurisdictions is key to mitigating these risks.

Emerging technologies

Advances in technology, particularly in fields like artificial intelligence (AI) and biotechnology, are constantly creating new dual-use goods.

Keeping pace with emerging technologies and ensuring that compliance systems are equipped to handle new types of dual-use goods presents an ongoing challenge for regulators and compliance officers.

Best Practices & Implementation Insights

  • Regularly update export control lists: Ensure that compliance systems are regularly updated with the latest regulations regarding dual-use goods and technologies. 
  • Develop strong due diligence protocols: Implement detailed KYC and KYT protocols to identify high-risk customers and transactions related to dual-use goods. 
  • Collaboration with authorities: Build strong relationships with national authorities and international bodies to ensure prompt reporting of suspicious transactions and compliance with export controls. 
  • Apply a risk-based approach: Prioritize transactions involving dual-use goods based on factors such as the destination country, intended use, and the nature of the customer. 
  • Employee training: Regularly train employees on the identification of dual-use goods, the regulatory requirements for their trade, and how to spot potential red flags.

Related Terms

  • Export Control
  • Proliferation Financing
  • Sanctions Screening
  • Know Your Customer (KYC)
  • Know Your Transaction (KYT)
  • Prohibited Entities List
  • Financial Sanctions

References

Ready to Stay
Compliant—Without Slowing Down?

Move at crypto speed without losing sight of your regulatory obligations.

With IDYC360, you can scale securely, onboard instantly, and monitor risk in real time—without the friction.

Get a Demo
charts charts-dark