star-1
star-2

Common Point-of-Purchase (CPP)

A Common Point-of-Purchase (CPP) refers to a merchant, payment terminal, or transaction environment where multiple compromised payment cards are believed to have been used prior to unauthorized or fraudulent activity being detected.

In the context of Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and fraud prevention, CPP analysis helps financial institutions, payment processors, and regulators trace the origin of card data breaches and identify compromised systems that may facilitate money laundering, identity theft, or large-scale payment fraud.

Overview

When a number of customers report unauthorized card transactions, investigators look for patterns among affected cards.

If multiple victims made legitimate purchases at the same merchant or used the same payment processor shortly before the fraud occurred, that merchant or processor becomes the suspected Common Point-of-Purchase.

This analysis is a critical component of card fraud detection, allowing financial institutions to isolate compromised environments and take preventive actions such as card reissuance, merchant audits, or transaction blocking.

While CPP investigations are primarily associated with card fraud, they also intersect with AML frameworks.

Proceeds of card-related fraud often pass through laundering channels such as money mules, cash withdrawals, and synthetic identities.

Identifying a CPP early helps disrupt these financial flows before they are integrated into legitimate systems.

How CPP Analysis Works

  • Detection of Fraudulent Activity: Financial institutions detect unusual or unauthorized transactions, either through customer reports or internal fraud monitoring systems.
  • Pattern Analysis: Analysts review legitimate transactions conducted shortly before fraudulent activity, identifying overlap in merchant IDs, terminals, or geolocations.
  • Cluster Mapping: By mapping transaction clusters, investigators determine if a specific merchant or processor consistently appears across multiple compromised cards.
  • Validation: Data is validated using transaction logs, acquirer records, and, in some cases, external breach intelligence from card networks or cybersecurity firms.
  • Mitigation Actions: Once a CPP is confirmed, affected cards are reissued, merchants may undergo a forensic assessment, and regulators are notified if systemic risk is suspected.

Relevance to AML

Though CPP identification is primarily a fraud management function, it contributes significantly to AML objectives by uncovering the initial stages of illicit fund movement.

Fraud proceeds generated from compromised cards are often used to finance additional criminal activity or laundered through channels designed to disguise their origin.

AML teams leverage CPP data in several ways:

  • Transaction Monitoring Integration: Linking CPP alerts with AML transaction monitoring systems enables institutions to identify possible laundering of fraud proceeds.
  • Customer Risk Profiling: Customers whose cards are linked to repeated CPP incidents may require enhanced due diligence (EDD) to ensure their accounts are not being exploited.
  • Reporting Obligations: Identifying a CPP linked to organized fraud rings may lead to Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) filed with Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs).
  • Collaboration with Law Enforcement: CPP findings often support joint investigations into criminal networks involved in large-scale data theft and laundering operations.

CPP and Payment Ecosystem Risks

Card payment systems involve multiple entities, issuers, acquirers, processors, and merchants, each presenting potential vulnerabilities. CPP breaches can result from:

  • Malware or Skimming Devices – Installed at merchant terminals or ATMs to capture card details.
  • Point-of-Sale (POS) Compromise – Attackers exploit outdated POS systems or weak encryption protocols.
  • Third-Party Vendor Breaches – Compromised payment processors or service providers expose merchant and customer data.
  • Insider Threats – Employees with access to payment systems misuse credentials to steal cardholder information.

Once card data is stolen, it may be sold on dark web marketplaces or used in synthetic identity fraud schemes—both of which generate illicit funds that require laundering.

Regulatory & Compliance Implications

CPP identification aligns with AML and fraud prevention requirements established by international regulators and financial standards organizations.

Institutions are expected to maintain robust detection mechanisms that can quickly identify common breach points and mitigate related financial crime risks.

Key obligations include:

  • FATF Recommendations 15 and 16: Emphasizing technology risk management and monitoring of electronic transactions.
  • PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard): Requiring secure handling of card data and immediate response to suspected breaches.
  • Local Data Protection Laws: Mandating timely breach notifications to regulators and affected customers.

Failure to address CPP incidents adequately can lead to reputational damage, regulatory penalties, and increased exposure to money laundering through compromised channels.

Best Practices for Institutions

  1. Integrate Fraud and AML Systems: Enable real-time data sharing between fraud detection and AML compliance platforms for early identification of linked activities.
  2. Leverage Advanced Analytics: Use machine learning to detect transaction clusters indicating possible CPPs before fraud spreads.
  3. Enhance Merchant Due Diligence: Conduct regular risk assessments of merchants and service providers handling sensitive card data.
  4. Implement Strong Incident Response Protocols: Define clear escalation procedures for reporting CPPs internally and to regulatory authorities.
  5. Collaborate Across the Ecosystem: Participate in industry-wide fraud intelligence networks and information-sharing initiatives.

Global Relevance

Globally, CPP investigations have played a critical role in uncovering major fraud networks.

For instance, coordinated efforts between card issuers, law enforcement, and cybersecurity firms have led to dismantling data theft rings responsible for millions in losses.

The insights gained from CPP analysis not only help secure payment systems but also enhance AML intelligence by tracing the movement of stolen funds through international financial channels.

Conclusion

The Common Point-of-Purchase concept bridges the gap between fraud detection and AML compliance.

By identifying where card data compromises occur, institutions can prevent large-scale fraud, trace illicit proceeds, and support broader efforts against financial crime.

Effective CPP analysis requires cross-functional collaboration, technological integration, and adherence to international regulatory standards.

As digital payment ecosystems expand, CPP monitoring will remain an essential tool in safeguarding financial integrity.

Related Terms

  • Card Fraud
  • Data Breach
  • Payment Processor
  • Transaction Monitoring
  • Suspicious Activity Reporting
  • PCI DSS
  • Fraud Risk Management

References

Ready to Stay
Compliant—Without Slowing Down?

Move at crypto speed without losing sight of your regulatory obligations.

With IDYC360, you can scale securely, onboard instantly, and monitor risk in real time—without the friction.

Get a Demo
charts charts-dark