star-1
star-2

Bribery Act 2010

The Bribery Act 2010 is a comprehensive piece of legislation enacted by the United Kingdom to modernize and strengthen the country’s anti-corruption framework.

It came into force on July 1, 2011, and is regarded as one of the most stringent anti-bribery laws in the world.

The Act criminalizes both the offering and accepting of bribes, as well as the failure of commercial organizations to prevent bribery within their operations.

It applies to individuals, businesses, and organizations with links to the United Kingdom, regardless of where the offense occurs.

The Bribery Act 2010 replaces previous UK laws such as the Public Bodies Corrupt Practices Act 1889, the Prevention of Corruption Act 1906, and the Prevention of Corruption Act 1916.

It aligns the UK’s anti-corruption regime with global standards set by the OECD and the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC).

Purpose & Scope

The core objective of the Bribery Act 2010 is to combat corruption and promote ethical business conduct both domestically and internationally.

It aims to ensure transparency in commercial activities, maintain public trust, and uphold the integrity of markets.

The Act applies to:

  • Individuals – Any person who offers, promises, gives, requests, or accepts a bribe.
  • Companies and Partnerships – Organizations incorporated in the UK or conducting business in the UK can be held liable for bribery offenses committed anywhere in the world.
  • Associated Persons – Employees, agents, subsidiaries, or third parties performing services on behalf of a company.

Key Offenses under the Bribery Act 2010

The Act outlines four main offenses that define its operational framework:

  • Bribing Another Person (Section 1):
     Occurs when a person offers, promises, or gives a financial or other advantage, intending to induce or reward improper performance of a relevant function or activity.

  • Being Bribed (Section 2):
     Involves requesting, agreeing to receive, or accepting a financial or other advantage in exchange for improper performance of a relevant function or activity.

  • Bribery of Foreign Public Officials (Section 6):
     Criminalizes bribery intended to influence foreign public officials to obtain or retain business advantages, aligning the UK’s framework with international anti-corruption treaties.

  • Failure of a Commercial Organization to Prevent Bribery (Section 7):
     A corporate offense introduced to hold companies accountable if someone associated with them engages in bribery for their benefit. Organizations can defend themselves only if they can demonstrate that they had “adequate procedures” in place to prevent bribery.

Adequate Procedures Defense

Under Section 7, a commercial organization can avoid liability if it can show it implemented “adequate procedures” to prevent bribery.

The UK Ministry of Justice (MoJ) published guidance built around six key principles to help organizations design and maintain such procedures:

  • Proportionate Procedures: Anti-bribery policies should be proportionate to the size, nature, and risk exposure of the organization.
  • Top-Level Commitment: Senior management and boards must foster a culture of integrity and lead by example.
  • Risk Assessment: Organizations must assess internal and external risks, including country, sector, and transaction risks.
  • Due Diligence: Businesses must perform thorough due diligence on third parties, agents, and intermediaries.
  • Communication (Including Training): Staff and partners must be informed and trained about anti-bribery policies.
  • Monitoring and Review: Regular evaluation ensures ongoing effectiveness and adaptation to emerging risks.

Jurisdictional Reach

The Act’s jurisdiction is notably broad. It applies to:

  • Any offense committed within the UK
  • Any individual or company with a UK connection committing bribery abroad.

This extraterritorial application means that non-UK entities can face prosecution in the UK if they conduct business or have operations linked to the country.

Enforcement & Penalties

The Bribery Act 2010 is enforced primarily by two UK agencies:

  • Serious Fraud Office (SFO): Handles serious or complex cases, often involving multinational corporations.
  • Crown Prosecution Service (CPS): Deals with general and lower-scale bribery offenses.

Penalties for non-compliance are severe:

  • Individuals: Up to 10 years’ imprisonment, unlimited fines, or both.
  • Organizations: Unlimited financial penalties and potential exclusion from public procurement contracts.
  • Reputational Damage: Loss of business, investor confidence, and public trust.

Bribery vs. Facilitation Payments

Unlike some jurisdictions, such as the United States under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), the Bribery Act 2010 makes no exception for facilitation or “grease” payments.

Any payment made to expedite routine government actions is considered a bribe under UK law.

Corporate Compliance Requirements

To ensure compliance with the Bribery Act, organizations should implement robust anti-bribery programs incorporating:

  • Clear anti-bribery policies and codes of conduct.
  • Employee and third-party training programs.
  • Whistleblower mechanisms for reporting unethical behavior.
  • Regular audits and risk assessments.
  • Transparent recordkeeping and financial controls.

International Alignment & Impact

The Bribery Act 2010 harmonizes the UK’s anti-corruption standards with global frameworks, promoting ethical business practices and fair competition.

It complements the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention and the UN Convention against Corruption.

The Act’s extraterritorial scope has made it a model for many other jurisdictions seeking to strengthen corporate accountability and transparency.

The Act also supports global AML efforts by discouraging bribery as a predicate offense to money laundering.

Illicit funds derived from bribery are often laundered through complex financial transactions, and effective enforcement under the Bribery Act contributes to identifying and tracing such proceeds.

Challenges & Criticisms

Some businesses initially criticized the Act for its broad definitions and the perceived risk of over-enforcement. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) expressed concern about the costs of implementing adequate procedures.

However, over time, regulatory guidance and case law have clarified expectations, helping organizations adopt proportionate compliance measures.

Examples of Enforcement

Notable cases under the Bribery Act include prosecutions involving large corporations and intermediaries engaged in foreign bribery schemes.

For example, the SFO has used Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPAs) to secure settlements from multinational companies, combining monetary penalties with obligations to enhance compliance frameworks.

Global Significance

The Bribery Act 2010 represents a milestone in global anti-corruption enforcement. Its strict liability for corporate failure to prevent bribery set new standards for compliance governance worldwide.

The Act reinforces the notion that ethical conduct is not just a legal obligation but a strategic business imperative.

Related Terms

  • Anti-Corruption
  • Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)
  • Money Laundering
  • Adequate Procedures
  • Serious Fraud Office (SFO)
  • OECD Anti-Bribery Convention

References

Ready to Stay
Compliant—Without Slowing Down?

Move at crypto speed without losing sight of your regulatory obligations.

With IDYC360, you can scale securely, onboard instantly, and monitor risk in real time—without the friction.

Get a Demo
charts charts-dark