star-1
star-2

Benami Account

A benami account is held under one person’s name while controlled by another to conceal ownership or the source of funds. Such accounts enable tax evasion and money laundering, prompting laws and AML frameworks to enforce transparency, beneficial ownership verification, and strict KYC compliance.

A benami account is an account held in the name of one person while the actual ownership and control lie with another. The word “benami” originates from Hindi, meaning “without name” or “nameless.”

In essence, a benami account conceals the identity of the real owner, allowing transactions or asset holdings to take place under another individual’s name.

These arrangements are often used to hide illicit wealth, evade taxes, or disguise the true source of funds, making them a critical concern in anti-money laundering frameworks.

Relevance in AML

Benami accounts undermine financial transparency and hinder the detection of money laundering, terrorist financing, and other financial crimes.

Since the registered account holder (the benamidar) is not the actual owner, tracing the origin or destination of funds becomes challenging.

Criminals exploit such accounts to layer transactions, transfer black money into the financial system, and conceal proceeds of corruption or illegal trade.

Authorities and financial institutions consider benami accounts a significant red flag for suspicious activity. Transactions involving unexplained sources of funds, inconsistent financial behavior, or use of multiple accounts under different names can indicate benami arrangements.

Regulators in several jurisdictions, particularly India, have enacted specific legislation to combat benami transactions and accounts.

Benami Transactions & Legal Framework

The Indian legal framework provides one of the most explicit definitions and prohibitions of benami accounts through the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, later amended as the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 2016 (PBPTA). The Act defines a benami transaction as one where:

  • Property is held by one person, but the consideration has been paid by another.
  • The person providing the consideration is the actual beneficiary.
  • The arrangement is intended to conceal ownership or evade taxes and legal obligations.

Under the PBPTA, both the benamidar (the ostensible holder) and the beneficial owner can face prosecution. The Act empowers authorities to seize and confiscate benami assets and impose imprisonment and fines on offenders.

Although benami laws originated in India, similar principles apply globally under different terms, such as “nominee accounts,” “proxy ownership,” or “straw man arrangements.” These structures are often scrutinized under broader anti-money laundering and beneficial ownership regulations.

Use of Benami Accounts in Money Laundering

Benami accounts are typically used during the placement and layering stages of money laundering. Common methods include:

  • Placement of illicit funds by depositing black money into accounts under other names.
  • Layering through multiple transactions and transfers between benami accounts to obscure the audit trail.
  • Integration of laundered money into the legitimate economy by investing in assets, real estate, or businesses.

Such accounts are also used for political funding, property purchases, or transferring unaccounted wealth across borders.

Detection & Prevention Measures

Financial institutions and regulators employ various mechanisms to detect and prevent the misuse of benami accounts.

  • Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD): Banks must verify beneficial ownership and identify the person exercising ultimate control over the account.
  • KYC Norms: Strict Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures require verification of identity, source of funds, and purpose of the account.
  • Transaction Monitoring: Automated systems monitor for patterns such as frequent deposits of small amounts, inconsistent activity, or fund transfers between unrelated accounts.
  • Suspicious Activity Reporting (SAR): Any indication of nominee or proxy account activity must be reported to the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU).

Supervisory authorities also mandate periodic reviews of customer data to ensure that beneficial ownership information remains accurate and up to date.

Regulatory Enforcement & Global Perspective

While the concept of benami accounts is most prominently regulated in India, similar frameworks exist worldwide under different designations. For instance:

  • The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) emphasizes beneficial ownership transparency to eliminate anonymous or proxy-held accounts.
  • The European Union’s AML Directives require member states to maintain central beneficial ownership registries.
  • The United States enforces ownership transparency through the Corporate Transparency Act, requiring reporting of beneficial owners to FinCEN.

These measures collectively aim to prevent the misuse of financial systems for concealing ownership or laundering illicit funds.

Challenges in Enforcement

Despite strict regulations, identifying benami accounts remains complex. Offenders often use trusted intermediaries such as relatives, employees, or shell companies to open and operate such accounts.

They may also use layered corporate structures or offshore entities to obscure control. Ensuring inter-agency data sharing, cross-border cooperation, and the integration of technology-driven tools like AI-based transaction analysis is essential for enforcement.

Another challenge lies in distinguishing genuine nominee arrangements, such as those used for legal inheritance or guardianship, from illicit benami holdings.

Regulators and compliance officers must evaluate the intent, financial relationship, and pattern of transactions to make this determination.

Conclusion

Benami accounts remain a significant threat to the integrity of financial systems, particularly in economies with large informal sectors. Their potential for anonymity and misuse enables money laundering, tax evasion, and corruption.

Global AML initiatives and national laws emphasize beneficial ownership transparency and strict KYC enforcement to mitigate these risks. As technology advances, data-driven monitoring and cross-jurisdictional collaboration will continue to play a key role in detecting and dismantling benami networks.

Related Terms

  • Beneficial Ownership
  • Shell Company
  • Know Your Customer (KYC)
  • Money Laundering
  • Suspicious Activity Reporting

References

Ready to Stay
Compliant—Without Slowing Down?

Move at crypto speed without losing sight of your regulatory obligations.

With IDYC360, you can scale securely, onboard instantly, and monitor risk in real time—without the friction.

Get a Demo
charts charts-dark